Re: Re: cvs: php-src / CODING_STANDARDS

From: Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 09:53:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: cvs: php-src / CODING_STANDARDS
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-6055@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 10:42:33 +0100 (CET) Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > Derick Rethans wrote: > > > -[6] Method names follow the 'studlyCaps' > > > > This is insane. > > > > Whether you like it or not, most people who use programming > > languages that support the paradigm of object-orientation use > > studlyCaps (or whatever you want to call them). > > It was not agreed on that this is a REQUIREMENT for all code, that's > why I removed it. Not to raise the flame again, but I think you are wrong here. See http://pear.php.net/news/meeting-2003-summary.php. Especially this line: "PHP object-oriented APIs should follow the PEAR coding standards." on which we agreed even before the meeting. Method names following PEAR CS must use studlyCaps: http://pear.php.net/manual/en/standards.naming.php Meeting where you, Sebastian Bergmann, Hartmut Holzgraefe, Jeroen Houben, Wolfram Kriesing, Jan Lehnardt, George Schlossnagle, Lukas Smith, Markus Wolff and Jani were present (add those I forgot ;) ), and all people online via IRC. And now I'm wondering why that suddenly becomes ugly and, as pointed Sebastion, why PHP should follow different things than 99.9999% of others OO langages. pierre reading 10k pending mails ... :P

« previous php.internals (#6055) next »