Re: zend_parse_parameters() improvements

Hi! > And just to clear, I agree with Sara that ! (both for l/d/b and the > pointer types) should not be redefined to "parameter was passed". But it's > my understanding that that's not what you're planning. I didn't have yet a good generic way to handle l/d/b with 'default' - in many cases for now I prohibited using 'default' in current code in this context - but if we had some improvement that allows to do it - like your patch, though not with ! - it would be definitely an improvement. I'll be done with rest of ZEND_NUM_ARGS() cleanup probably by the end of next week, and then I could look into integrating your changes, I think it makes my patch work much better in some cases :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227