Re: zend_parse_parameters() improvements

From: Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 07:26:51 +0000
Subject: Re: zend_parse_parameters() improvements
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-61539@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > I was just thinking - since we have basically no code relying on this, > why introduce rather artificial concept of "null means no parameter" > (which I'm sure won't work in all cases and won't be expected in all > cases) if we can have perfectly good concept "default means no > parameter" which won't clash with any existing code? I'd just like to point out that I wouldn't bet much on the parameter skipping via default making it in. I don't want to extrapolate too much, but from what I've gathered the feature has rather bad community support. At least as far as I can tell, people are really interested in having named parameters, but would rather not have parameter skipping as implemented. But that's getting off-topic :/ Nikita

« previous php.internals (#61539) next »