Re: What is our definition of a "Backward Compatibility Break"
| From: | Stas Malyshev | Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:15:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What is our definition of a "Backward Compatibility Break" | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-62938@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
> This is concerning me a bit. Does this mean that PHP 5.5 will be
> branched off PHP 5.4 and we will then backport features from master?
> If so, this would seem like a Very Bad Idea to me, from a purely
> technical point of view. Unless I'm much mistaken this would have to
I think also it's not a good idea, not sure what Pierre meant by that
though. So far I don't think we have anything BC-breaking in master, but
if we do we may have to split it in bc and non-bc branches.
> Before Pierre said that I was under the impression that PHP 5.5 will
> be branched off master, which would make a lot more sense to me. Could
> someone clarify how it will be done?
I was assuming this too. I guess we need some clarification on what
Pierre was meaning.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227