Re: What is our definition of a "Backward Compatibility Break"

From: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:59:20 +0000
Subject: Re: What is our definition of a "Backward Compatibility Break"
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-62945@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> We do not have this clue in master and there are for sure non >>> acceptable BC breaks in master. They won't be in 5.5. I'd said before, >> >> Why don't we have a clue? We definitely do have a clue, we have git logs >> and we know what went into master - it is not that old. Could you list >> the non-acceptable BC breaks that are now in 5.5? > > Reading it does not tell me if something has changed from 5.4 to master/5.5. > > However we can at least run against the 5.4 tests suite and compare, > see why tests fail etc. :) Btw, on a similar note, I would really appreciate if every change in the internals APIs (additions, API changes, removals, etc.) as well as the user land areas are documented in https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/UPGRADING.INTERNALS and https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/UPGRADING respectively. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#62945) next »