Re: Property Accessors v1.2 : Interfaces
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:37:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Property Accessors v1.2 : Interfaces | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-63420@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> I *think* we are on the same page here, though I'm not sure what 'user' is
> referring to (user of interface "implementer") or (user of class B). In any case, I
> don't believe that your class B would be allowed at present, but if it is, then it should not
> be allowed because defining a property to satisfy the requirements of an accessor is not right.
According to whom? In my opinion, not allowing a property to satisfy
the requirement of an accessor is wrong.