Re: Property Accessors v1.2 : Interfaces
| From: | Etienne Kneuss | Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:08:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Property Accessors v1.2 : Interfaces | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-63425@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Etienne Kneuss <colder@php.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>> Etienne Kneuss wrote:
>>>
>>> I can understand why we might not want that in PHP in order to
>>> simplify the implementation, but it we follow logical reasoning I
>>> can't see why we shouldn't implement that.
>>
>>
>> With a decent IDE you don't need any of this overhead anyway. When you see
>> the sorts of increase in time taken to do things why wouldn't you move as
>> much as you can OUT of the core runtime code anyway?
>>
>
> Please do not hijack this thread, we are not discussing whether or not
> accessors should be implemented, but how.
To be perfectly clear, by "why we shouldn't implement that" the "that"
means being able to implement an interface with accessors using plain
properties.
>
> Best,
>
>> --
>> Lester Caine - G8HFL
>> -----------------------------
>> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
>> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
>> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
>> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
>> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Etienne Kneuss
> http://www.colder.ch
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch