Re: Property Accessors 1.2 for Final Review before Vote
| From: | Levi Morrison | Date: | Wed, 02 Jan 2013 18:34:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Property Accessors 1.2 for Final Review before Vote | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-64483@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Steve Clay <steve@mrclay.org> wrote:
> On 1/2/13 6:36 AM, Clint Priest wrote:
>>
>> Here is the updated RFC incorporating the feedback from previous rounds of
>> discussion.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2
>
>
> The RFC does not specify whether it's a fatal error to define a class
> (directly or via extends/traits) which has both a traditional property and
> accessor with the same name, but I think this should be prohibited to avoid
> confusion.
I think it is explained in the RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/propertygetsetsyntax-v1.2#shadowing
but the
code example doesn't reflect that. Perhaps my understanding is flawed.