Re: Property Accessors 1.2 : parent::$foo Issue

Missed that bit... I think that would add two bits of inconsistency though.... (Without the $) -Clint On Jan 4, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> A recent suggestion from Stas is to use parent->$foo (note the use of -> >> rather than ::) > > I actually proposed parent->foo. parent->$foo implies the name of the > variable is "$foo", not "foo" - just as in $this->$foo. Yes, I know it > does not match parent::$foo - but I can't do much about it. In any case, > better not to add another inconsistency to the list of existing ones. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227