Re: [RFC] Reflection annotations reader

Hi! > Why does this need to be part of Reflection? Seems a rather odd place for > it IMHO, since it basically hard-codes the functionality into part of the Reflection is an odd place for functionality that describes attributes of classes, methods, properties, etc.? ITYM "natural place" - that's exactly what Reflection does. > core that's not trivially extendable (at least $class->getMethods() is hard > to override)... Why you need to override getMethods in Reflection? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227