Re: [RFC] Reflection annotations reader

On 8 January 2013 03:55, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > On the contrary, plenty of implementations means there's a need in this > functionality, and it might be a good idea to have one standard > implementation if it can cover like 80% of use cases. I agree, there is a need in this functionality, but all those userland implementations were at the first place made because this functionality was not part of the language. I think docblocks is not the solution, doc blocks are just comments, and I would expect any code to work the same way if I remove my comments. Pierrick