Re: - True Annotations
| From: | Benjamin Eberlei | Date: | Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:18:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: - True Annotations | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-64747@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Every other language used :: or . for namespaces. The problem with @ is its
definition as error suppression operator, and Guilherme and Pierrick didn't
come up with a solution to stay BC using the @. Additionally some other
languages use [] (which also doesnt work in PHP).
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com>wrote:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
>
> Perhaps I am blind, but I do not see where in the RFC is defends its
> choice to use
<>. Every other language I know of uses
> @, and I do
> not know of technical reasons why we couldn't use the same symbol.
> Annotations wouldn't be able to contain expressions so there wouldn't
> be anything that could generate a suppressible error.
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>