RE: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it?
| From: | Zeev Suraski | Date: | Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:16:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-65394@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre.php@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 3:37 PM
> To: Rasmus Lerdorf
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZTS - why are you using it?
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Those ISPs are probably stuck in old fastcgi-land and haven't figured
> > out FPM's ondemand pooling. If you idle out the ondemand children
> > somewhat quickly you can support a lot of vhosts without using much
> > memory since each one doesn't need to have a running process. Only
> > hosts actually being accessed will have running processes.
>
> Not talking about Linux here, but IIS have something similar, but really
not even
> close to how FPM performs or how it works (having basically the pros of
TS and
> NTS).
On Windows with impersonation you're actually in a better situation than
you are in Linux. You could hold a small pool of processes and handle as
many different users as you'd like.
Zeev