Re: Re: [PHP Wiki] new user: fabpot
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:24:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PHP Wiki] new user: fabpot | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Groups: | php.internals php.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-66403@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Hannes Magnusson
> > <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am well aware of that as I am the onlyone who is monitoring user
> >> requests to update the wiki.
> >>
> >> However when a request comes in, like this one, about the ability to
> >> *vote* I am lost.
> >
> > Project lead can vote yes. Also in the case of Fabien it is even more
> > easy, he provided so many tests (directly or via his teams), he is a
> > contributor per se.
> >
> >> I don't understand those voting rules and therefore am asking for
> >> clarification, again.
> >
> > php.net contributors, project leaders (verified, not random ppl).
>
> How do I verify it, and which projects are applicable?
> Does it depend on how many contributors it has? Users? How long it has
> been around?
> Commercial? OSS? Library? Framework? Applications? Websites?
Exactly, this random apply rules nonsense needs to stop. I have nothing
against Fabien voting but there is nowhere written who can vote or not
(no, the voting RFC is too vague as well). I for one, would like to see
a much stricter list of people who can vote.
cheers,
Derick