Re: RFC: Anonymous Classes
| From: | Lars Strojny | Date: | Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:35:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Anonymous Classes | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-69293@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Joe,
Am 23.09.2013 um 19:22 schrieb Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>:
[...]
> As I have said, serialization does work, and unserialization does work ...
>
> Classes do have unique names, so as long as the entry is present upon unserialize you will get
> the object you expect ... if the entry is not present unserialization will fail silently.
>
> The same kind of thing can happen where you have declared a class based on some predicate,
> whose value has changed upon unserialize and so the entry is not present ...
>
> I'm not sure it is necessary to force any particular behaviour for serialization, it
> depends entirely on the application whether or not the entry is present upon serialization, it
> should be left down to the programmer.
it would make sense to forbid serializing anonymous classes like we forbid serializing closures.
What do you think?
cu,
Lars
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail signature.asc