Re: RFC: Anonymous Classes

From: Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:01:29 +0000
Subject: Re: RFC: Anonymous Classes
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-69352@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Am 26.09.2013 12:16 schrieb "Joe Watkins" <krakjoe@php.net>: > For the following reasons the syntax should remain as it is: > > It is consistent with anonymous function calls - args after definition ... I think it is exceedingly rare for anynomous functions to be called at their point of definition, while the constructor of your anonymous class will alreays be called there. > It does not make sense to pass arguments to a constructor that might not yet be declared The constructor will be called after the full class definition has been seen anyway; where the arguments are put syntactically doesn't change that, does it? My proposal ($that = new class(constructor args) places the constructor args in exactly the same place they are when instantiating a nonanonymous class. best regards Patrick

« previous php.internals (#69352) next »