Re: Comments on non-unique naming convention for closures

From: Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 03:46:31 +0000
Subject: Re: Comments on non-unique naming convention for closures
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-70452@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi! > Having discussed the options with Dmitry and another contributor off PHP > Internals list, we have decided to base the generated <internal> > function name on a hash of the source content between the text pointers Wouldn't that imply that two closures with the same code would be identified as the same closure? If so, I'm not sure this is a correct approach - one can definitely have two different closures (with different states, different bindings, etc.) having same source text. Or am I missing something here? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227

« previous php.internals (#70452) next »