Re: Proposal for RFC: get_class_constants()
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:41:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for RFC: get_class_constants() | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70632@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 14/12/13 00:28, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Currently the same behavious is only possible by the help of reflection, which due to the nature of reflection takes a bit more work/cpu-cycles.Unless you're doing this a billion times a second, I can't see why the number of cpu cycles for this would matter. And why duplicate functionality needlessly, in that case? What's so bad about the current Reflection way of doing it, except for performance? I can't see this proposal really being that useful or going anywhere. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/