Re: Proposal for RFC: get_class_constants()
| From: | James Gilliland | Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:33:33 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for RFC: get_class_constants() | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-70645@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Troll much?
Anyways, along the rest of the thread, a function to support the people
working with objects that don't want to work with objects is a weak place
to argue from. However if we're keeping get_class_* methods, API completion
seems worthwhile.
On Dec 15, 2013 3:13 PM, "Crypto Compress" <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a short fairy tale:
> For a long time thePHPwayâ„¢ was to build a function for everything someone
> needed/could imagine. This is why PHP is so easy, effective and triumphant.
> But somehow the highlander principle found it's way into PHP and nothing
> will ever be as it was before. So flog the reflection argument to death.
>
> $
> ”|EêjŸ
|‚`vhttp://www.mail-archive.com/internals@lists.php.net/msg64242.html
>
> Cheers!
> cryptocompress
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>