Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC

From: Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:58:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-71089@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch> wrote: > I did, unless it is not an error in my browser the section "open question" > is empty. > I do not know which last email you mean but anyway the RFC ( > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params) still states: > "If named parameters are introduced, signature validation should make sure > that parameter names are not changed. Usually > signature mismatches between an interface and an implementing class throw > a fatal error, but this is not possible in > this case due to the large BC break it would cause. Instead we could use > some lower error type for this (warning / > notice / strict)." > > Did you open another RFC? > It looks like you fell into the wiki-redesign trap. The "Open questions" is a super-heading for "Syntax", the next two headings and the "Signature validation [...]". The new wiki design just makes the heading types so similar in font size that they are hard to distinguish. Nikita

« previous php.internals (#71089) next »