Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
| From: | Nikita Popov | Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:58:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-71089@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch> wrote:
> I did, unless it is not an error in my browser the section "open question"
> is empty.
> I do not know which last email you mean but anyway the RFC (
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_params) still states:
> "If named parameters are introduced, signature validation should make sure
> that parameter names are not changed. Usually
> signature mismatches between an interface and an implementing class throw
> a fatal error, but this is not possible in
> this case due to the large BC break it would cause. Instead we could use
> some lower error type for this (warning /
> notice / strict)."
>
> Did you open another RFC?
>
It looks like you fell into the wiki-redesign trap. The "Open questions" is
a super-heading for "Syntax", the next two headings and the "Signature
validation [...]". The new wiki design just makes the heading types so
similar in font size that they are hard to distinguish.
Nikita