Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
| From: | Ángel González | Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:00:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-71095@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 12/01/14 15:39, Robert Stoll wrote:
Since the RFC has not included my concerns so far I am going to bring them up again. The included validation of signatures is a huge BC break and thus a no-go for PHP 5.x IMO: http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:jtfa52bzgsua7yrt+state:results http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:u5y2pvzttbudkxqe+state:results The error/warning on conflictive parameter names could be done just when calling with named parameters.