Re: Re: Revert session_serializer_name(), session_gc()

Hi all, On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote: > It is not broken functionally, indeed. > It's broken by design - if I write session_start(), options or not, I > would never expect it to immediately close the session. It's highly > misleading and this will lead to a lot of abuse. > I don't want to confuse users. Better name would be appreciated. Perhaps, "close" may be better option name. session_start(['read_only'=>true]); ↓ session_start(['close']=>true); Any comments/better names? Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net