Re: PHP Specification
| From: | David Soria Parra | Date: | Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:21:21 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP Specification | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-73455@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
>
> On 26/03/2014 18:58, David Soria Parra wrote:
>> "Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
>>> On 24/03/2014 10:37, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 10:15 +0100, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
>>>>> * the historical interpreter [1],
>>>> How is that historic? It is the prime standard with most active
>>>> contributors etc.
>>> Historical is not synonym of out-dated. Historical means it is the first
>>> interpreter, that's all.
>> We should just call it cphp or something to distinguish language (PHP) from the
>> php.net reference implementation :)
> What about php-src?
I am not sure about php-src as it refers to the source itself, but it's fine
by me as long as we have a distinguished name.