Re: PHP Specification

From:	Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa	Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:09:57 +0000
Subject:	Re: PHP Specification
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6	Groups:	php.internals
Request:	Send a blank email to internals+get-73459@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

On 27/03/2014 18:21, David Soria Parra wrote:

"Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
On 26/03/2014 18:58, David Soria Parra wrote:
"Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa" <ivan.enderlin@hoa-project.net> schrieb:
On 24/03/2014 10:37, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 10:15 +0100, Ivan Enderlin @ Hoa wrote:
      * the historical interpreter [1],
How is that historic? It is the prime standard with most active contributors etc.
Historical is not synonym of out-dated. Historical means it is the first interpreter, that's all.
We should just call it cphp or something to distinguish language (PHP) from the php.net reference implementation :)
What about php-src?
I am not sure about php-src as it refers to the source itself, but it's fine by me as long as we have a distinguished name. Yup, definitively. We will discusss about it later.

-- Ivan Enderlin Developer of Hoa http://hoa-project.net/ PhD. student at DISC/Femto-ST (Vesontio) and INRIA (Cassis) http://disc.univ-fcomte.fr/ and http://www.inria.fr/ Member of HTML and WebApps Working Group of W3C http://w3.org/