Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > > int64 proposal is still in draft for very long time. > > Sorry, but it was proposed and rejected because of the changes were > too big for the 5.x serie. It has been said, as arguments for the no, > that it would not be a problem for php 6. We are so far. > I was never glad with size_t string lengths and told about it. > > > Do you provide support for all other unrelated proposals when you offer > your > > own? > > I do not understand the question, what do you mean? > I mean that when you develop something big, you have to be concentrated on the goals you are going to solve and not on compatibility with others proposals. > > However, about support, we do offer support for almost every proposal, > be for testing, build fixes, etc. Pro actively in most cases, whether > it is in our priorities list or not. My reasoning here is pretty > simple, a stable PHP, for all supported platform or configuration is > critical for the success of PHP. Cooperation too. > > > Lets think how to integrate them. I propose doing it in two steps > (measuring > > the performance and memory consumption difference). > > If the degradation is going to be invisible, I won't object. > > The numbers are available already, using master and 5.5-5.6. We > obviously do not have numbers using your patch but I do not think the > delta will be any different. > phpng completely changes zval structure and reduces overhead of some subsystems, so the numbers might be different. Thanks. Dmitry. > > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org >