Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement

From: Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 09:56:21 +0000
Subject: Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-74005@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote: > > On 7 במאי 2014, at 09:13, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net> wrote: > > > > > > Playing devil's advocate: does anyone really need SAPIs other than > > FastCGI, CLI, and embed? And if so: do we care enough to burden > > ourselves with their maintenance? > > > > I think you just called me "the devil" ;) > > Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would > need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD). > Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and > while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly > brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be > relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner). > > I'd support it. > > Zeev > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > You forgot fpm and phpdbg from that list. A little bit offtopic, but I think it would be nice if we could have some pecl-like infrastructure to host and install 3rd party sapis without the need to bundle them with the core. ps: maybe something like https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66589 could be also considered then. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

« previous php.internals (#74005) next »