Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Sat, 17 May 2014 20:36:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-74305@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I think that the serious core changes require technical expertise before
voting (like Nikita made).
And the results of such expertise should be published in additional to RFC
on the same page.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
> On 17 May 2014, at 20:46, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:
>
> > Implementation changes don't fit in this RFC process too well.
> > Implementation changes should be dealt with by those who own the
> > implementation.
>
> I don’t and can’t agree with this. Zend changes will ultimately affect
> everyone.
>
> It is not just Zend maintainers who’ll be affected by the 64-bit patch,
> for example. Everyone would, as it would increase PHP’s memory usage.
>
> Also, I am unconvinced that just because the people who maintain Zend
> (say) want something, that they are necessarily right.
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>