Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs
| From: | Kris Craig | Date: | Sun, 18 May 2014 09:10:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to increase the required majority for all RFCs | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-74334@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 7:02 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> My vote is for 66%+1 on engine and/or language changes and 50%+1 on side
>> changes.
>>
>
Agreed, except that we need to strengthen the wording by more specifically
stating what "engine and/or language changes" does and does not mean. It's
easy to agree on this in principle, but the devil is in the details. Right
now, there aren't any.
> If I want to suggest a Jsonable interface which purely affects a subset of
>> functions and nothing else, I don't think 66% is needed for change to go
>> in.
>>
>> My 2¢,
>>
>>
> this is what I would consider reasonable too, with the extension than any
> removal of existing (and documented) functionallity should also require 2/3
> of the votes.
>
Also agreed.
--Kris