Re: 64bit and phpng, votes and plans

yes. Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > > > > I appreciate your professionalism in helping with phpng. > > > > I object against the proposal, because in my opinion, it makes > significant > > degradation even for master. > > (Please don't argue about it again. You have your opinion, I have mine, > we > > already wrote a lot). > > > > I also think, it makes sense to target at least IS_LONG part of this > patch > > to phpng. > > > > Other changes are questionable. In phpng we may relatively easy check the > > impact of 64-bit string size on performance and memory consumption to > make a > > decision. I don't have any special opinion right now. > > > > I didn't get your position about zend_size_t in all core structures. And > > this is the main question. > > I think I was again not clear. This is the part we will drop. We > simply can't do it now for the reasons I explained in the mail. But as > I and Nikita said earlier there are areas for improvements and tweaks, > only the right time to do it is debatable, I prefer to have a stable, > testable branch before going to change these parts again with the risk > of making the whole thing hard to test, debug or improve. Is it > something you can live with? > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org >