Re: [RFC] Scalar Type Hinting With Casts (re-opening)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote: > Ferenc Kovacs wrote (on 15/07/2014): > >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote: >> >> as I mentioned above, nobody argues that input validation (and escaping >>>> output in a context sensitive manner) is a must. >>>> >>> Isn’t a must, surely? (I assume that was a typo) >>> >> >> I wasn't talking about the rfc or the typehints, but having proper input >> validation in your application in general. >> >> > I think it was just sloppy grammar: you wrote "nobody argues that ... is a > must" but meant "nobody argues that ... isn't a must", or "nobody > argues > against ... being a must"; or perhaps "nobody disagrees that ... is a must" > / "everybody agrees that ... is a must". > > :) sorry, not a native speaker. so you are saying that "nobody argues that $someGenericStatement" is not proper grammar? in my case the $someGenericStatement was that "input validation is a must"(aka mandatory). but I think that at this point I've made myself clear, so let's go back to the topic (or continue the offtopic in private). -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu