Re: [RFC] intdiv()
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2014 15:15:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] intdiv() | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75593@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 16 Jul 2014, at 02:51, Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net> wrote:
> TL;DR -- I agree with the principal but want implemented as the infix
> operator %% with a test for PHP_INT_MIN %% -1 === false (and a E_WARNING).
The RFC has been updated to v0.2. It now proposes a %% operator for integer division (with
corresponding %%= assignment operator). However, it returns 0 for the PHP_INT_MIN overflow case like
%, rather than FALSE and an E_WARNING.
The original intdiv() proposal is kept as a fallback; two votes will be held simultaneously, one 2/3
vote for the %% operator and a 50%+1 for the intdiv() function. If the first fails, then if the
second did not, the intdiv() function is implemented instead. This way we’ll still at least have a
way to do integer division in PHP, if not a full operator.
Nikita Popov doesn’t seem to be a fan of the %% syntax, so it may be subject to change, though I
think it’s the best I’ve heard so far. ;)
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/