Re: [RFC] intdiv()
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:05:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] intdiv() | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75688@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 18 Jul 2014, at 04:39, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com> wrote:
> This makes it more complicated because a language change requires 2/3
> majority while a new function requires 50% + 1.
>
> To make things simpler - and I believe it had been proposed before - the
> main vote should include the implementation as a function and the secondary
> vote should be for the operator.
That’s the current proposal in the RFC. A 2/3 operator vote simultaneous with a fallback 50%+1
function vote.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/