Re: [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2014 15:43:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 20 Jul 2014, at 16:39, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might be just me, but the whole RFC actually seems particularly
> one-sided. The argument for PHP 6 is very short and reads half-baked. The
> overwhelming majority of this very short section of the RFC is spent
> describing how naming the release “PHP 6” will be a problem, with a very
> wishy-washy conclusion that the author “expects” and “thinks” it won’t end
> up being a problem. The PHP 6 section makes no attempt to provide counter
> points to things mentioned in the following section, nor really attempts to
> make *any* strong point at all.
I swear the PHP 6 section was much longer before. Did Zeev delete some of it?
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/