Re: [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP
| From: | Andrea Faulds | Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:56:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-75851@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 22 Jul 2014, at 14:27, Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote:
> the RFC would be much better with a different structure. Currently, it's laid out in what
> you might call an "adversarial" style - arguments for one side, then arguments for the
> other; this doesn't lend itself well to summarising all the previous discussions, because it
> just reads as a discussion of its own.
That’s actually what I’ve been thinking recently. Having a case for PHP 6 and a case for PHP 7
doesn’t really make much sense anyway, as all a case for PHP 6 needs to do is rebut the arguments
for PHP 7, for the most part.
Maybe if I have some time I’ll try to restructure the RFC.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/