Re: [RFC] Introduce Abstract Syntax Tree

Nikita Popov wrote: > Yes, anything containing simple variables (like $i) will often deviate from > the usual evaluation order due to the CV optimization. I don't touch that. > What I've changed now is that ${a()}[b()] = c() will continue to call a, b, > c, rather than calling c, b, a (which was what the AST implementation > initially did). I honestly don't think that it matters, but I figured that > it's best to stick with the more "logical" behavior as long as it's not too > much trouble :) Thanks for the explanation. :) Anyway, I try to avoid relying on any particular evaluation order between sequence points. -- Christoph M. Becker