Re: [RFC] Introduce Abstract Syntax Tree

From: Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:01:28 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce Abstract Syntax Tree
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-76631@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net> wrote: > Am 18.08.2014 um 09:32 schrieb Dmitry Stogov: >> Can OPcahce always keep AST in shared memory and don't copy it into >> process memory on each request? (ext/opcache/zend_accelerator_util_funcs.c) > > Why would the AST need to be cached? I can imagine optimizations happening during the cache lifetime and not only right on the 1st request/compilation. Having the AST at hand can be handy. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#76631) next »