Re: Re: [RFC] pecl_http
| From: | Michael Wallner | Date: | Tue, 19 Aug 2014 12:19:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] pecl_http | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76701@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
> > Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
> > be in core as well.
> >
>
> I never really understood why they are needed or why they have been
> splitted off. I can imagine that other exts may need a similar thing
> but...
>
To be reusable. pecl/raphf is also used by pecl/pq; peck/propro has not had
another use case yet, though.
--
Regards,
Mike