Re: Re: [RFC] pecl_http

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote: > On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: >> > Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should >> > be in core as well. >> > >> >> I never really understood why they are needed or why they have been >> splitted off. I can imagine that other exts may need a similar thing >> but... > > > To be reusable. pecl/raphf is also used by pecl/pq; peck/propro has not had > another use case yet, though. propo could be a spl thing, if usefull for other. As of raphf, not sure, mixed toughts. Maybe as part of main/? I am not sure I like to habe two other extensions for that, they are handy tho' :) -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org