Re: ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt failure
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2014 05:24:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt failure | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76715@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote:
> Hey:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
> > ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch,
> but
> > the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
> > wrong assumption.
> >
> > Resource leaks can't be caught using get_memory_usage().
> >
> > To have a robust way to detect resource leaks I propose a new function -
> > get_resources() that returns an array of all registered resources or an
> > array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
> >
> > I'm not sure if such small change needs RFC.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> I think it's okey to have a such function.
>
> we have get_defined_functions/constants/vars
>
> thanks
> >
> > Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
>
> --
> Laruence Xinchen Hui
> http://www.laruence.com/
>