Re: ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt failure
| From: | Julien Pauli | Date: | Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:12:45 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt failure | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-76720@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
> Anyone objects about it or thinks it needs RFC?
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Laruence <laruence@php.net> wrote:
>
>> Hey:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Yesterday we discussed with Nikta the failure of
>> > ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt. It was in context of AST patch,
>> but
>> > the failure is not related to AST at all. It's just a bad test that makes
>> > wrong assumption.
>> >
>> > Resource leaks can't be caught using get_memory_usage().
>> >
>> > To have a robust way to detect resource leaks I propose a new function -
>> > get_resources() that returns an array of all registered resources or an
>> > array of registered resources of particular type. See patch:
>> >
>> > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab
>> >
>> > I'm not sure if such small change needs RFC.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> I think it's okey to have a such function.
>>
>> we have get_defined_functions/constants/vars
>>
>> thanks
I would have then called it get_defined_resources() , for consistency.
Julien.P