Re: Re: 64 bit string offsets
| From: | Dmitry Stogov | Date: | Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:17:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: 64 bit string offsets | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-77008@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Anatol,
what do you mean? heap allocated structure?
I think, it's not a good option :(
I didn't have time to think about this yet.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:
> On Sun, August 31, 2014 22:31, Anatol Belski wrote:
> > Hi Pierre,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, August 31, 2014 14:12, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Anatol,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For what I see it should have no impact, either mem usage or perf but
> >> when such offset is used, in 64bit.
> >>
> >> However some numbers are better, could you provide some using
> >> exclusively this syntax and using common apps pls? Only to be sure.
> >>
> > while testing drupal and wp, i see a regression of .3% on mem usage and
> > .1% on perf. When using the exclusive syntax, i see a perf difference
> > almost in ms range, so even not worth to mention. The functional part
> shows
> > no diff so far.
> >
> Laruence on the IRC suggested to implement this as a new zval type, so I'm
> going to try it out yet as that's a cleaner way do go.
>
> Regards
>
> Anatol
>
>