Re: Re: com php-src: Remove support for classes without class entries: Zend/zend_API.c Zend/zend_builtin_functions.c Zend/zend_closures.c
Zend/zend_execute.h Zend/zend_interfaces.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.h Zend/zend...

From: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:21:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: com php-src: Remove support for classes without class entries: Zend/zend_API.c Zend/zend_builtin_functions.c Zend/zend_closures.c
Zend/zend_execute.h Zend/zend_interfaces.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.c Zend/zend_object_handlers.h Zend/zend...
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.cvs php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-77849@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
yes, we will need to do something when we will going to freeze future major development. https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading is not up to date as well. Thanks. Dmitry. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On 10 Oct 2014, at 03:57, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote: >> >> > Yeah, JavaBridge used it, but it doesn't means it need it. >> > >> > zend_class_entry * _php_java_get_class_entry(zval *object TSRMLS_DC) >> > { >> > return java_class; >> > } >> > >> > I agree, it would be better if we would discuss it on @internals, but it >> > would take much longer time >> > If you still see use cases for it, please show >> >> If anything, could this be recorded in the UPGRADING file? >> >> Thanks >> > > Sure thing, I added some notes to UPGRADING.INTERNALS. Feels a bit weird, > given how most of our object handlers changed in master and these are the > only ones mentioned. We should probably merge > https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading into UPGRADING.INTERNALS > at some > point. > > Nikita > >

« previous php.internals (#77849) next »