Re: Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_default_classes.c zend_default_classes.h zend_execute.h zend_execute_API.c
| From: | Timm Friebe | Date: | Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:04:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [ZEND-ENGINE-CVS] cvs: ZendEngine2 / zend_default_classes.c zend_default_classes.h zend_execute.h zend_execute_API.c | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-7830@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 18:54, Sterling Hughes wrote:
[...]
> I get the concept, that's the reason Exception was added. But its meant
> to be a voluntary thing (I believe this has been discussed before btw),
> a standard class that gives users something to build upon, should they
> want to. I think an all-your-base-is-belonging-to-Exception is the
> wrong way to go.
I agree with Sterling. What if I have some really methods in my base
class that I rely on being existant in each and every subclass of it,
including Exception (or any other name I thought of to work around
"Exception" being built-in)?
- Timm