Re: [VOTE] Abstract final / Static classes
| From: | guilhermeblanco@gmail.com | Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:28:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] Abstract final / Static classes | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-79604@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It's part of the history of that RFC, accessible here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class?rev=1417060830
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Florian Margaine <florian@margaine.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com <
> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> After a good round of discussion, I updated the original "abstract final
>> class" proposal into a "static class" proposal.
>> However, I kept both patches online so it's up to voters decide which one
>> it could be implemented.
>> Patches are now complete and voting phase starts now and will be active
>> until 12/19/2014.
>>
>> As this is a language update, it requires 2/3 pro or against the feature.
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class
>
>
> Why does the example use
final?
>
> final static class Environment
> {
> private static $rootDirectory = '/var/www/project';
> public static function getRootDirectory()
> {
> return self::$rootDirectory;
> }
> }
>
> Also, the vote presents 2 options. The RFC is in a weird state where it
> mentions "abstract final" but doesn't explain anything about them. The
> votes don't seem to be what the example is...
>
> Could you edit your RFC?
>
>
>>
>>
>> Happy voting!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Guilherme Blanco
>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
>> GTalk: guilhermeblanco
>> Toronto - ON/Canada
>>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Florian Margaine
>
--
Guilherme Blanco
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
GTalk: guilhermeblanco
Toronto - ON/Canada