Re: [VOTE] Abstract final / Static classes

Hi everyone, Voting is now closed. Since this RFC required a 2/3 majority, the result is against the implementation of this feature in PHP. RFC is now updated and moved to withdrawn section. Thanks, On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meesters@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 13 Dec 2014, at 00:35, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote: > > > > RFC is updated exposing both possible usages with both explanations. > > Hope it doesn't confuse even more. > > Hi, in your "As static class” example, it doesn’t really demonstrate that > you can omit the “static” modifier from the function declarations. > > Also, it’s not clear if the same applies to “As abstract final”. > > > > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Florian Margaine <florian@margaine.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Le 12 déc. 2014 17:28, "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" < > >> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> a écrit : > >>> > >>> It's part of the history of that RFC, accessible here: > >> > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class?rev=1417060830 > >>> > >> > >> But then it isn't clear as of right now. What is proposed? The example? > >> The votes? What does final has to do with > >> static? > >> > >> I'm confused. > >> > >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Florian Margaine < > florian@margaine.com> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 5:12 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com < > >> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi internals, > >>>>> > >>>>> After a good round of discussion, I updated the original "abstract > >> final > >>>>> class" proposal into a "static class" proposal. > >>>>> However, I kept both patches online so it's up to voters decide which > >> one > >>>>> it could be implemented. > >>>>> Patches are now complete and voting phase starts now and will be > active > >>>>> until 12/19/2014. > >>>>> > >>>>> As this is a language update, it requires 2/3 pro or against the > >> feature. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_final_class�x > >>>>> �����Qx�;b�� > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Why does the example use final? > >>>> > >>>> final static class Environment > >>>> { > >>>> private static $rootDirectory = '/var/www/project'; > >>>> public static function getRootDirectory() > >>>> { > >>>> return self::$rootDirectory; > >>>> } > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> Also, the vote presents 2 options. The RFC is in a weird state where > it > >> mentions "abstract final" but doesn't explain anything about them. The > >> votes don't seem to be what the example is... > >>>> > >>>> Could you edit your RFC? > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Happy voting! > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Guilherme Blanco > >>>>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com > >>>>> GTalk: guilhermeblanco > >>>>> Toronto - ON/Canada > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> -- > >>>> Florian Margaine > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Guilherme Blanco > >>> MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com > >>> GTalk: guilhermeblanco > >>> Toronto - ON/Canada > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Florian > >> > > > > > > -- > > Guilherme Blanco > > MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com > > GTalk: guilhermeblanco > > Toronto - ON/Canada > > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada