Re: [RFC] pecl_http

On 23/01/15 09:27, Michael Wallner wrote: > >> On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> >> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and >>> dependencies (propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to >>> restart discussion on the topic, whether it is feasible to add >>> pecl_http as a bundled extension to the core. >>> >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http >>> [...] >> By the way, I did not yet look more deeply to raphf and propro but >> that's something I like to discuss. If their feautures are useful >> for other parts of the core, extensions, bundled or not, we should >> consider moving them to the main APIs and not as two new >> independent extensions. >> [...] > I think a short discussion about where to put the dependant code and > noting the outcome in the RFC could be the way to go. I guess just a > few people who think that pecl_http is about to be included would > suffice. I just pushed a tree with pecl/http merged to ext/http, pecl/propro merged to ext/standard and pecl/raphf merged to main/. https://github.com/m6w6/php-src/tree/merge-http -- Regards, Mike