Re: [RFC] pecl_http

On Jan 28, 2015 4:49 PM, "Michael Wallner" <mike@php.net> wrote: > > On 23/01/15 09:27, Michael Wallner wrote: > > > >> On 23 01 2015, at 02:40, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> > >> wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> Now, that I'm mostly done with porting pecl/http [1] and > >>> dependencies (propro [2] and raphf [3]) to ZE3 I'd like to > >>> restart discussion on the topic, whether it is feasible to add > >>> pecl_http as a bundled extension to the core. > >>> > >>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/pecl_http > >>> > [...] > >> By the way, I did not yet look more deeply to raphf and propro but > >> that's something I like to discuss. If their feautures are useful > >> for other parts of the core, extensions, bundled or not, we should > >> consider moving them to the main APIs and not as two new > >> independent extensions. > >> > [...] > > I think a short discussion about where to put the dependant code and > > noting the outcome in the RFC could be the way to go. I guess just a > > few people who think that pecl_http is about to be included would > > suffice. > > I just pushed a tree with pecl/http merged to ext/http, pecl/propro > merged to ext/standard and pecl/raphf merged to main/. > > https://github.com/m6w6/php-src/tree/merge-http Nice move!! Thanks :) I am all for it :) > > -- > Regards, > Mike