Re: [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions

From: Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:54:17 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-81779@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> Libmcrypt is a dead cow but not much of a threat for now. On the other >> hand cclient is dangerous, it should have been removed long time ago >> already. > > I'm not sure - what is the dangerous part? Are you referring to some > published CVEs or other reports? Then it would be useful to list them > here and on the RFC. I have to dig back (or may be in the last threads where we discussed that). I will try to to post them here (RFC is in voting phase so no edition) asap. However, I totally fail to understand your reasoning. We know both libraries are dead. ext/Imap is almost not used anymore by any major tool relying on imap, Which appealing reasons do you have to force us to have to maintain them for the next decade? Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#81779) next »