Re: [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions
| From: | Tony Marston | Date: | Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:56:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC][VOTE] Removal of dead or not yet PHP7 ported SAPIs and extensions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-81799@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Pierre Joye" wrote in message news:CAEZPtU6au_Fi2bW=E2kiQLErq4h97VhU8NkL-Z9KatLsteFaRQ@mail.gmail.com...
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com> wrote:Excuse me, but *I* use ext/imap quite extensively, and I would be most upset if you dropped it without providing an alternative. I would also be upset if you dropped it without ever it ever being marked as deprecated. -- Tony MarstonHi!I have to dig back (or may be in the last threads where we discussed that). I will try to to post them here (RFC is in voting phase so no edition) asap. However, I totally fail to understand your reasoning. We know both libraries are dead. ext/Imap is almost not used anymoreLibmcrypt is a dead cow but not much of a threat for now. On the other hand cclient is dangerous, it should have been removed long time ago already.I'm not sure - what is the dangerous part? Are you referring to some published CVEs or other reports? Then it would be useful to list them here and on the RFC.