Re: [DISCUSSION] Make empty() a Variadic
| From: | Sebastian B.-Hagensen | Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:09:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [DISCUSSION] Make empty() a Variadic | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-82613@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
2015-02-13 14:45 GMT+01:00 Thomas Punt <tpunt@hotmail.co.uk>:
> Hi Francois,
>
>> From: francois@tekwire.net>
>> May I suggest to extend your proposal to is_null() with the same logic ?
> If we were to do the same with is_null(), then would it not be best to do it with all the
> is_*() functions? I would be more than happy to cater for those functions as well, though their
> usages seem a lot less common. What does everyone else think?
While I don't know how common such a usage is I'm certain that there
is a use case for it. However, just modifying a subset of the is_*
functions sounds like a bad idea. If such a change is applied it
should be done to all type related is_* functions and be similar to
issets behavior (return false if at least one argument is not of the
given type).
Thanks,